INDEPENDENT COUNSEL ZIP FILE (702 kb file containing about 2.5 megabytes of Wordperfect files) may be downloaded if you would like a complete set of Dr. Webb's detailed discussion of this topic.  You may also view a sample of these files using your browser by clicking on the links below.

Contents

Part I
The federal Office of "Independent Counsel,"
created by the Ethics in Government Act,
U.S. Congress, 1978, for investigating
possible Violations of federal criminal Laws,
and particularly for the criminal Prosecution of such
Persons as the President of the United States,
and other high Officers of the United States,
is unconstitutional.

An Analysis of the Constitution of the United States
with respect to the Question of the proper Mode
of Inquisition into the alleged criminal Behavior
of federal Officers, including the President
of the United States.

Original Paper
August 18, 1998

Part II
Further Proof of the Unconstitutionality
of the Office of Independent Counsel

Part III
The Supreme Court's Usurpation
of the Executive Power of Government
Broadening the Analysis of the Unconstitutionality
of the Office of Independent Counsel to include
the Supreme Court's Assumption of the sole Power
of the Appointment, Removal, and Direction of
the Marshal of the Supreme Court,
which is found to be also unconstitutional, as it amounts to
Usurpation of the whole Executive Power of the Government.

Part IV
The federal Crimes of Perjury, Subornation
of Perjury, and "Obstruction of Justice,"
and the Question of the Commission of such Crimes
by William J. Clinton in relation to the
United States District Court Proceedings
in Paula Jones v. Clinton,
as charged by the Independent Counsel, and by the
House of Representatives' Impeachment of Mr. Clinton,
reviewed with respect to the Constitution of the United States,
including a Review of the Definition of
"other high Crimes and Misdeameanors,"
as prescribed for Impeachment by
Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution.

Part V
President Clinton was unlawfully compelled
by the federal Judiciary to stand the Paula Jones Suit,
and to submit to Interrogation, called "Discovery,"
which was essentially a "compulsive Examination"
of a party, not a witness, and was unlawfully interrogated
on Matters that were not material to the Issue of the Suit;
and, therefore, he committed no Crime of corrupt Perjury
by his Testimony, being Answers to Questions
of his private Life,
which naturally were given to protect himself,
Family, Friends and Associates from Intrusion.

Part VI
Proof that the Supreme Court's Decision
in Clinton v. Jones (1997), ordering President
William J. Clinton to stand the Paula Jones civil Suit,
including the compulsory Discovery Proceedings,
was oppressive, being founded on the Court's
unconstitutional Doctrine of Presidential Immunity
from civil Suits by "Judicial Discretion," and on
the Court's disregard of the Duties of President
as expressed in the Constitution

Part VII
The Court-ordered compulsive Examination
of Mr. Clinton in the Paula Jones Suit
(a Deposition and written Interrogatories)
was unconstitutional, being founded on
Supreme Court-made Rules of Proceeding
which violate the Constitution of the United States.

Part VIII
The Independent Counsel's Prosecution
of the President of the United States
for alleged Crimes of Perjury
and "Obstruction of Justice."
Plus
The improper Power vested in
the "Independent Counsel" by Statute
to intermeddle in civil Suits,
which creates a Presumption that
the Independent Counsel, Mr. Starr,
had counseled the Plaintiff's Attorneys
in the Paula Jones Litigation to interrogate Mr. Clinton
on embarrassing Discovery Questions (Temptations of Perjury),
and thereby lay a Snare for Perjury.

Part IX
The present Senate Trial of the Impeachment
of President William J. Clinton is being
conducted, and is otherwise proceeding,
unconstitutionally.

Part X
Political Motives behind the Prosecution
of the President

Part XI
Commentary on the Behavior of Mr. Clinton,
as President of the United States,
pertaining to the Matters of
the Independent Counsel's criminal Prosecution of Mr. Clinton,
the Impeachment of Mr. Clinton by the House of Representatives,
and Trial of the Impeachment by the Senate, and
as these Matters relate to the United States Attacks on Iraq,
and renewed threatened U.S. Attacks in Yugoslavia.


Return to Dr. Webb's Home Page